Skip to content

Conversation

@ArgoZhang
Copy link
Member

@ArgoZhang ArgoZhang commented Mar 13, 2025

Link issues

fixes #5620

Summary By Copilot

This pull request adds a new unit test to the BootstrapBlazorOptionsTest class to verify the ModalSettings property of the BootstrapBlazorOptions class.

Testing improvements:

Regression?

  • Yes
  • No

Risk

  • High
  • Medium
  • Low

Verification

  • Manual (required)
  • Automated

Packaging changes reviewed?

  • Yes
  • No
  • N/A

☑️ Self Check before Merge

⚠️ Please check all items below before review. ⚠️

  • Doc is updated/provided or not needed
  • Demo is updated/provided or not needed
  • Merge the latest code from the main branch

Summary by Sourcery

Tests:

  • Adds a unit test to verify that the ModalSettings property is not null and that the IsFade property can be set and retrieved correctly.

@sourcery-ai
Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Mar 13, 2025

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request adds a unit test to verify the functionality of the ModalSettings property within the BootstrapBlazorOptions class. The test ensures that the property is not null and that its IsFade sub-property can be correctly set and retrieved.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Added a unit test for ModalSettings property of BootstrapBlazorOptions.
  • Added a new test method ModalSettings_Ok.
  • The test asserts that the ModalSettings property is not null.
  • The test verifies that the IsFade property can be set and retrieved correctly.
test/UnitTest/Options/BootstrapBlazorOptionsTest.cs

Assessment against linked issues

Issue Objective Addressed Explanation
#5620 Add a unit test for the ModalSettings class to improve code coverage.

Possibly linked issues


Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
  • Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
    an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@bb-auto bb-auto bot added the test This is unit test label Mar 13, 2025
@bb-auto bb-auto bot added this to the v9.4.0 milestone Mar 13, 2025
@ArgoZhang ArgoZhang merged commit 2dbddb9 into main Mar 13, 2025
4 checks passed
@ArgoZhang ArgoZhang deleted the test-options branch March 13, 2025 06:11
Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @ArgoZhang - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

  • Consider using Verify to simplify the assertion of object properties.
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟢 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟢 Security: all looks good
  • 🟢 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 13, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (8178e81) to head (7db3356).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main     #5621   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          650       650           
  Lines        29626     29626           
  Branches      4166      4166           
=========================================
  Hits         29626     29626           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

test This is unit test

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

test(ModalSettings): add unit test

2 participants